USPTO serial 97340773
HEY YARA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUBOIS, SUSAN L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HEY YARA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Scarborough, ON, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jordan A. LaVine
Jordan A. LaVine FLASTER/GREENBERG P.C.SUITE 100, 100 FRONT STREETCONSHOHOCKEN, PA 19428United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software, namely, downloadable computer software for personal information management, for voice recognition, for speech to text conversion, for voice-enabled applications, downloadable computer software used to process voice commands and create audio responses to voice commands, downloadable computer software for dictation, downloadable computer software for scheduling appointments, reminders, and events on an electronic calendar, downloadable computer software for organizing and accessing phone numbers, addresses, and other personal contact information, downloadable computer software for providing navigation and way finding, downloadable computer software for providing real-time data regarding room and building occupancy, downloadable computer software for enabling hands-free use of a mobile or stationary device through voice recognition, downloadable computer software for facilitating reservations of rooms, desks and workstations, downloadable computer software for messaging, teleconferencing and videoconferencing between users, downloadable computer software allowing administrators to control and restrict user access, group and identify users, set workplace occupancy capacities, and set policies associated with use of a building or other assets, downloadable computer software for creating and hosting virtual communities for users to organize groups, participate in discussions, get feedback from other users, and engage in social, business, and community networking and business collaboration and communication, downloadable computer software for hosting electronic facilities for others, for organizing and conducting meetings, events and interactive discussions via communication networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Providing online chat rooms and electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among users in the field of general interest, and providing an online forum for transmission of messages among computer users; Broadcasting communication services, namely, transmitting e-mails, faxes, text messages and telephone voice messages to designated recipients for others; teleconferencing and videoconferencing services; transmission of digital files and transmission of electronic mail | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for use in social networking and social introduction; providing customized computer searching services, namely, searching and retrieving information at the user's specific request via the Internet; software as a Service (SaaS) services featuring, computer software for personal information management, voice recognition, speech to text conversion, enabling voice-enabled software applications, processing voice commands and creating audio responses to voice commands, dictation, scheduling appointments, reminders, and events on an electronic calendar, organizing and accessing phone numbers, addresses, and other personal contact information, providing navigation and way finding, providing real-time data regarding room and building occupancy, enabling hands-free use of a mobile or stationary device through voice recognition, facilitating reservations of rooms, desks and workstations, messaging, teleconferencing and videoconferencing between users, allowing administrators to control and restrict user access, group and identify users, set workplace occupancy capacities, and set policies associated with use of a building or other assets, creating and hosting virtual communities for users to organize groups, participate in discussions, get feedback from other users, and engage in social, business, and community networking and business collaboration and communication, hosting electronic facilities for others, for organizing and conducting meetings, events and interactive discussions via communication networks; application service provider featuring application programming interface (API) software for facilitating online services for social networking, navigation, way finding, and workstation reservations and for allowing data retrieval, upload, download, access and management | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 15, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 13, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 13, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 17, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 16, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 25, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 16, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 12, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 3, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 7, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 11, 2023 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 10, 2023 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2023 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 9, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 9, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 22, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |