USPTO serial 97342387
TRAK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YOUNG, THOMAS PAUL
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TRAK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEPHEN JADIE COATES
STEPHEN JADIE COATES COATES IP3213 W WHEELER ST, #362SEATTLE, WA 98199UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic devices, namely, surface receivers and subsurface transmitters for transmitting and receiving frequency information, power levels, fluid pressure, roll and pitch, and device tension for underground drill heads; Electronic devices, namely, surface receivers and subsurface transmitters for pairing frequency of devices, measuring elevation changes and providing steering instructions to devices and heavy machinery; Electric batteries; Electronic devices, namely, surface receivers and subsurface transmitters embedded with software for transmitting and receiving frequency information, power levels, fluid pressure, roll and pitch, and device tension for underground drill heads; Electronic devices, namely, surface receivers and subsurface transmitters embedded with software for pairing frequency of devices, measuring elevation changes and providing steering instructions to devices and heavy machinery | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2025 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 19, 2025 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 19, 2025 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 8, 2025 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Oct 23, 2024 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2024 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 21, 2024 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 17, 2024 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2024 | PGTT | PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2024 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 15, 2024 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 10, 2024 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 17, 2024 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 13, 2024 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 13, 2024 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 12, 2024 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 12, 2024 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 12, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 28, 2023 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2023 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 28, 2023 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 26, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 26, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 1, 2023 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 31, 2023 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2023 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 31, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 31, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 16, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 11, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |