USPTO serial 97342525
SIGMACLOUD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PILATO, DARREN ANTHONY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 302- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SIGMACLOUD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dana Stewart-Mekdara
DANA STEWART-MEKDARA GLOBAL TRADEMARKS, INC.505 S. VILLA REAL DRIVE, SUITE 102ANAHEIM HILLS, CA 92807UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Consultancy for alarm companies pertaining to the provision of security systems for buildings, homes, and offices; Design, maintenance, and programming of computer software, for use by security alarm companies, which monitor security alarm systems for buildings, homes, and offices; Computer software development in the field of mobile applications for use by security alarm companies which provide monitoring of security alarms for buildings, homes, and offices; Development of new technology for security alarm companies in the field of security alarm systems for buildings, homes, and offices; Development of security alarm systems for buildings, homes, and offices; Providing technology information to security alarm companies in the field of security alarm systems for buildings, homes, and offices; Providing technology information updates to security alarm companies for home security alarm systems via the global computer network; Research and development of computer software for use by security alarm companies, for building, home, and office security alarm systems; Research and development of technology for security alarm companies in the field of security alarm systems for buildings, homes, and offices; Software development in the field of security alarm systems for buildings, homes, and offices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 15, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 15, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 27, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 2022 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |