USPTO serial 97346168
S SOLID DEVELOPMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHMIELARSKI, ANDREW J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with S SOLID DEVELOPMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Moises A. Saltiel
201 ALHAMBRA CIRCLE, SUITE 802CORAL GABLES, FL 33134UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Building construction; Building construction services; Building construction supervision; Building construction supervision services for building projects; Building construction supervision services for real estate projects; Building construction supervision services relating to shopping centers, industrial complexes, office buildings, residential buildings and other real estate developments; Building construction supervision services relating to shopping centres, industrial complexes, office buildings, residential buildings and other real estate developments; Building inspection in the course of building construction; Commercial building construction; Construction consultancy; Construction of buildings; Construction of civil engineering structures; Construction of commercial buildings; Construction planning; Construction project management services; Construction supervision; Consultancy and information services in the field of construction; Consultancy and information services relating to construction; Consultancy relating to building construction supervision; Consultancy relating to residential and building construction; Consultancy relating to the construction of buildings; Consultancy services relating to building construction; Consultancy services relating to the construction of buildings; Consulting in the field of building construction; Custom building construction; Custom construction of buildings; Custom construction of homes; Custom construction of houses; General construction contracting; On-site construction supervision; Providing construction information; Provision of construction advice; Provision of construction information; Provision of information in relation to building construction; Provision of information relating to building construction; Provision of technical information in the field of building construction; Real estate development and construction of commercial, residential and hotel property; Renovating and constructing homes for low-income families; Residential and building construction consulting; Residential and commercial building construction; Residential building construction; Supervision of building construction | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2020 |
| 042 | Advisory services for others in the field of building architecture; Architectural consultancy services; Architectural consultation; Architectural design; Architectural services; Consulting services in the field of architectural design; | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2020 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 18, 2026 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 2, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 7, 2025 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 19, 2025 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2025 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 16, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 6, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 26, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 26, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 31, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 24, 2023 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Apr 24, 2023 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 2022 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |