USPTO serial 97347211
ONBLI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SIEGEL, PAIGE JORDAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ONBLI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas L. Lineberry
Douglas L. Lineberry Offit Kurman220 North Main StreetSuite 500GREENVILLE, SC 29601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer software for online shopping; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer software for facilitating payments and online transactions; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer software that provides retail and ordering services for a wide variety of consumer goods; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer software for use in disseminating advertising for others; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer software for disseminating information regarding product discounts; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer software for scheduling shipping and deliveries; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer software for providing reports and insights into an organization's spending using dashboards; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer software for managing an organization's expenditures and budgets for purchasing supplies; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer software for identifying products approved for purchase by an organization; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer software for suggesting products for purchase by an organization pursuant to predetermined parameters; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer software for processing approvals of an organization's purchases of supplies; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer software for creating charts and graphs showing an organization's spending and budgets; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer software for tracking spending and savings on supply purchases; Software-as-a-Service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in evaluating an organization's spending on supplies and budgets; Software-as-a-Service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in creating reports on an organization's spending on supplies and budgets; Software-as-a-Service (SAAS) services featuring software for use as a spreadsheet, in particular, managing an organization's expenditures and budgets for purchasing supplies; Software-as-a-Service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in indicating approved and restricted products under an organization's procurement policy; Software-as-a-Service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in suggesting products for purchase by an organization pursuant to predetermined parameters; Software-as-a-Service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in processing approvals of an organization's purchase of supplies; Software-as-a-Service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in creating charts and graphs showing an organization's spending and budgets; Software-as-a-Service (SAAS) services featuring software for use as a spreadsheet, in particular, tracking spending and savings on supply purchases; Software-as-a-Service (SAAS) services featuring software for storing customer information, in particular, credit card, debit card, or bank information, for processing payments; Software-as-a-Service (SAAS) services featuring software for secure storage of customer payment methods; Software-as-a-Service (SAAS) services featuring software for processing payments for product purchases; Platform-as-a-Service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for use in evaluating an organization's spending on supplies and budgets; Platform-as-a-Service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for use in creating reports on an organization's spending on supplies and budgets; Platform-as-a-Service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for use as a spreadsheet, in particular, managing an organization's expenditures and budgets for purchasing supplies; Platform-as-a-Service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for use in indicating approved and restricted products under an organization's procurement policy; Platform-as-a-Service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for use in suggesting products for purchase by an organization pursuant to predetermined parameters; Platform-as-a-Service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for use in processing approvals of an organization's purchases of supplies; Platform-as-a-Service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for use in creating charts and graphs showing an organization's spending and budgets; Platform-as-a-Service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for use as a spreadsheet, in particular, tracking spending and savings on supply purchases; Platform-as-a-Service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for use in storing customer information, in particular, credit card, debit card, or bank information, for processing payments; Platform-as-a-Service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for use in the secure storage of customer payment methods; Platform-as-a-Service featuring computer software platforms for use in processing payments for product purchases | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2025 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 15, 2025 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 18, 2025 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2025 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2025 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2025 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 12, 2024 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2024 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2024 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2024 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 9, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 9, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2024 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2024 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 15, 2024 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2024 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 15, 2023 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 20, 2023 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2023 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 31, 2023 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2023 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 5, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 5, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |