Drawing for COMFORTBALANCE

USPTO serial 97350422

COMFORTBALANCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REEVES, APRIL ELIZABETH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COMFORTBALANCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Amanda M. Blackburn

Amanda M. Blackburn Honigman LLP39400 Woodward Ave, Suite #101BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304-5151United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic modules for monitoring and controlling climate control systems used to adjust the temperature of vehicle seats; Electronic modules for monitoring and controlling electric thermal conditioners, namely, resistive heaters, thermoelectric heating and cooling devices, and electric motor-driven fluid moving devices and compressors; Temperature sensors for use in monitoring and controlling climate control systems in vehiclesACTIVE—
011Vehicle climate-control system for heating, ventilation and air conditioning of vehicle seats comprised of refrigerating installations and heat pumps; thermoelectric heaters and coolers for vehicle seats; electric heaters for commercial use in vehicle seats, namely, electric resistive heaters; thermal conditioning devices, namely, heat exchangers not being parts of machines for heating and cooling of occupant support surfacesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 9, 2025MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 9, 2025ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 1, 2024EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 1, 2024EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 1, 2024EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 1, 2024EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 22, 2024EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2024EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 21, 2024EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 21, 2024EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 21, 2024EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Feb 21, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2024ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 21, 2024REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 18, 2023EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 18, 2023EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 18, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 12, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 10, 2023EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 10, 2023EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 10, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 23, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 6, 2022ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 28, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 28, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 8, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 26, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 25, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 25, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 25, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 19, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 12, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 9, 2022NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance