USPTO serial 97353100
BURGEON BOTANICALS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEENAN, CAYLA FAY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BURGEON BOTANICALS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toluca Lake, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul E. Thomas
Paul E. Thomas PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLPP.O. BOX 10500MCLEAN, VA 22102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Hair clippers; Hair clippers for babies; Hair clippers for personal use, electric and non-electric; Hair cutting scissors; Hair straightening irons; Hair trimmers; Bags and cases specially adapted for holding or carrying hair cutting scissors and shears; Bags and cases specially adapted for holding or carrying electric hair curling irons; Electric hair clippers; Electric hair crimper; Electric hair curling irons; Electric hair cutters; Electric hair straightening irons; Electric hair trimmers; Electric and battery-powered hair clippers; Electric and battery-powered hair trimmers; Electric crimping irons for the hair; Electric ear hair trimmers; Electric hand-held hair styling irons; Electric irons for styling hair; Electric nasal hair trimmers; Electrolysis apparatus for hair removal; Hand-operated hair clippers; Laser hair removal apparatus, other than for medical purposes; Non-electric hair clippers; Non-electric hair straightening irons; Non-electric crimping irons for the hair; Scissors adapted to receive attachment guide combs for hair cutting and trimming | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 18, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 14, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 13, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 25, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 29, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 23, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 11, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 13, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 31, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 2022 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Aug 30, 2022 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |