Drawing for SUPER-PATCH

USPTO serial 97356958

SUPER-PATCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LINDEMYER, ANKHI MUKHERJEA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 123

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUPER-PATCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Darren Spielman

Darren Spielman THE CONCEPT LAW GROUP, P.A.6400 N ANDREWS AVE., SUITE 500FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33309United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010wearable patches for general health and well-being, namely, self-adhesive patches bearing fine ridge patterns being apparatuses for acupressure therapyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 6, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 6, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 6, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 22, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 22, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 18, 2026ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2026GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 9, 2026GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 9, 2026CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jan 30, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 29, 2025GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 29, 2025GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 29, 2025CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 1, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 1, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 18, 2025ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Apr 25, 2025GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 25, 2025GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 25, 2025CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Apr 25, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 4, 2024GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 4, 2024GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 4, 2024CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 4, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 4, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 4, 2024ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 4, 2024ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2024GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2024GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2024CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jan 3, 2024RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 27, 2023GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 27, 2023GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 27, 2023CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 27, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 26, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 26, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 27, 2023GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2023GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2023CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 15, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 14, 2022NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance