USPTO serial 97358743
FLEXULS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OH, HYUN-JUNG
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FLEXULS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Schenectady, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jared L. DuJack
JARED L. DUJACK SCHMEISER, OLSEN & WATTS, LLP22 CENTURY HILL DRIVE, SUITE 302LATHAM, NY 12110UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Consulting, analysis, and testing for hydrocarbon processing and upgrading in the field of crude oil, distillate, or petrochemical streams; Consulting, analysis, and testing for adsorption-based desulfurization in the field of crude oil, distillate, or petrochemical streams; Consulting, analysis, and testing for sulfur polishing in the field of crude oil, distillate, or petrochemical streams; Providing technology information relating to processing and upgrading in the field of crude oil, distillate, or petrochemical streams; Providing technology information relating to adsorption-based desulfurization in the field of crude oil, distillate, or petrochemical streams; Providing technology information relating to sulfur polishing in the field of crude oil, distillate, or petrochemical streams; Technical consulting in the field of oil and gas processing and upgrading; Technical consulting in the field adsorption-based desulfurization in the field of oil and gas processing and upgrading; Technical consulting in the field of sulfur polishing in the field of oil and gas processing and upgrading | ACTIVE | Apr 28, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 23, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 23, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 6, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |