USPTO serial 97366009
INTROHIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 672
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COLLOPY, DIANE PATRICIA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 137
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INTROHIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Fredericton, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Z. Peter Sawicki
Z. Peter Sawicki WESTMAN, CHAMPLIN & KOEHLER, P.A.121 SOUTH EIGHTH STREET, SUITE 1100MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advisory services and consultancy relating to business management, business planning, and business analysis, namely, compilation and systematization of client notes, client information, internal business communications, client communications and client interactions into computer databases to provide internal corporate and client relationship insight and improved internal corporate and client management and client service | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use with a database that compiles data in the nature of client communication, internal corporate communications and customer information, internal and client communications and internal and client interactions reports to provide internal and client relationship insight and improved internal and client relationship management and client service utilizing artificial intelligence, machine learning and data automation; platform as a service (PaaS) featuring computer software platforms in the nature of a database that compiles data a database that compiles data in the nature of client communication, internal communications and customer information, internal and client communications and internal and client interactions reports to provide internal and client relationship insight and improved internal and client relationship management and client service utilizing artificial intelligence, machine learning and data automation with regard to internal corporate and customer information, communications and interactions to provide internal corporate and client relationship insight and improved internal corporate and client relationship management and internal personnel management and client service utilizing artificial intelligence, machine learning and data automation | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2026 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2026 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2025 | RGRR | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2025 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 4, 2025 | ERRS | TEAS REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT | — |
| Feb 26, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 26, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 28, 2025 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 20, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 16, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 12, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 5, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 8, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |