Drawing for GITAPPS

USPTO serial 97370828

GITAPPS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GITAPPS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dianne M. Smith-Misemer

Dianne M. Smith-Misemer HOVEY WILLIAMS LLP10801 MASTIN BOULEVARD, SUITE 1000OVERLAND PARK, KS 66210UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable computer programs, namely, computer software for orchestrating, configuring, modeling, provisioning, securing, monitoring, or automating the deployment of applications, middleware configurations, cloud services, database changes or computing resources in development, test or production environmentsACTIVE
042Providing software as a service for the purpose of integrating, orchestrating, configuring, modeling, provisioning, securing, monitoring, or automating the deployment of applications, middleware configurations, cloud services, database changes or computing resources in development, test or production environments; consulting services in the fields of computer software designs, development, deployment, and maintenance of applications; Software as a Service (SAAS) services featuring software and software support services for integrating, orchestrating, configuring, modeling, provisioning, securing, monitoring, or automating the deployment of applications, middleware configurations, cloud services, database changes or computing resources in development, test or production environments; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for platform integration and for integrating, orchestrating, configuring, modeling, provisioning, securing, monitoring, or automating the deployment of applications, middleware configurations, cloud services, database changes or computing resources in development, test or production environmentsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 17, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 17, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 13, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 21, 2022CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED
Nov 21, 2022APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF
Nov 2, 2022EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED
Oct 18, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Oct 18, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 28, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Sep 13, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 7, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 6, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 6, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 30, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 26, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Apr 22, 2022NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance