USPTO serial 97373897
ZIPP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, DAVID T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ZIPP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Portland, OR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Omar Darwich
OMAR DARWICH THE DARWICH LAW FIRM300 WEATHERSTONE DR, #190WADSWORTH, OH 44281UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Credit card terminals; Point-of-sale terminals; Electronic point-of-sale (POS) systems comprised primarily of point-of-sale terminals, bar code readers, touchscreen monitors, keyboards, document printers, scanners, and recorded operating software | ACTIVE | Mar 8, 2022 |
| 036 | Credit card authorization services; Credit card factoring services; Credit card payment processing services; Credit card transaction processing services; Financial advisory and consultancy services; Financial analysis and research services; Financial research and information services; Financial restructuring services; Loyalty program payment processing services; Merchant services, namely, payment transaction processing services; Merchant banking services; Merchant banking and investment banking services; Providing electronic processing of ACH and credit card transactions and electronic payments via a global computer network; Bill payment services provided via mobile and world wide web applications; Commercial lending services; Consumer lending services; Credit card transaction processing services provided via mobile and world wide web applications; Electronic credit card transaction processing; Financial services, namely, credit agencies featuring credit processing, namely, credit checking, credit analyzing, and financial reporting services; Financial transaction services, namely, providing secure commercial transactions and payment options using a mobile device at a point of sale; Payment processing services, namely, credit card and debit card transaction processing services; Processing of credit card payments; Processing of credit card payments via near field communication (NFC) technology-enabled devices; Providing cash and other rebates for credit card use as part of a customer loyalty program; Strategic financial advisory services; Strategic corporate financial advisory services | ACTIVE | Mar 8, 2022 |
| 042 | Application service provider (ASP) featuring e-commerce software for use as a payment gateway that authorizes processing of credit cards or direct payments for merchants | ACTIVE | Mar 8, 2022 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 7, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 7, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 7, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 21, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |