USPTO serial 97374133
CHROMA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DAWE III, WILLIAM H
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHROMA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rajesh Fotedar
RAJESH FOTEDAR COGNITION IP P.C.201 MISSION ST., SUITE 1200SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software application for identifying machine learning model data responsible for generating inaccurate machine learning model output; Downloadable software application featuring a data plane of a software platform that identifies machine learning model data responsible for generating inaccurate machine learning model output; Downloadable software application featuring a database, for implementation within a customer computer cloud environment, for use in identifying machine learning model data responsible for generating inaccurate machine learning model output | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer software for identifying machine learning model data responsible for generating inaccurate machine learning model output; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer software for providing a dashboard allowing users to collaborate in modifying machine learning model data identified as being responsible for generating inaccurate machine learning model output; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer software for providing a dashboard for reporting machine learning model data identified as being responsible for generating inaccurate machine learning model output; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer software for providing a dashboard for generating analytics based on machine learning model data identified as being responsible for generating inaccurate machine learning model output; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer software for providing a dashboard for sending information to a machine learning data labelling provider regarding machine learning model data identified as being responsible for generating inaccurate machine learning model output; Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) featuring software for identifying machine learning model data responsible for generating inaccurate machine learning model output; SaaS featuring software for providing a dashboard allowing users to collaborate in modifying machine learning model data identified as being responsible for generating inaccurate machine learning model output; SaaS featuring software for providing a dashboard for reporting machine learning model data identified as being responsible for generating inaccurate machine learning model output; SaaS featuring software for providing a dashboard for generating analytics based on machine learning model data identified as being responsible for generating inaccurate machine learning model output; SaaS featuring software for providing a dashboard for sending information to a machine learning data labelling provider regarding machine learning model data identified as being responsible for generating inaccurate machine learning model output | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2023 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| May 3, 2023 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2023 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 2022 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |