USPTO serial 97374326
GOURMÉ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COFFEY, AARON
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GOURMÉ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Etobicoke, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kimberly Bullock Gatling
Kimberly Bullock Gatling FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP212 Carnegie Center Drive, Suite 400GREENSBORO OFFICEPrinceton, NJ 08540Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Provision of an on-line marketplace for buyers and sellers of goods and services; ordering services for third parties, namely, online ordering featuring food, drink, nutrition, and kitchen products; publication of publicity texts; public opinion polling; organization of food events, exhibitions, fairs and shows for commercial, promotional and advertising purposes for third parties benefits; presentation of services on communication media for commercial purposes, namely, promoting the services of others by distributing online advertising materials; presentation of goods on communication media, for retail purposes, namely, providing home shopping services in the field of food by means of providing online restaurant menus; price comparison services; promoting the goods and services of others; procurement of contracts for others, namely, procuring of contracts for the purchase and sales of food products; compilation of directories for publishing on the internet; providing a searchable online advertising guide featuring the goods and services of other online vendors on the internet; advertising, marketing and promotional services for third parties benefits; the bringing together, for the benefit of others, of a variety of goods, excluding the transport thereof, namely, of foodstuffs and beverages, tobacco products enabling customers to conveniently view and purchase those goods by way of a shop, exhibition space for commercial purposes, in a general catalogue, on an Internet website, road shows, exhibitions, fairs, shop-in-shops, in advertising material, namely, advertising brochures and leaflets | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Presentation of goods on communication media, for retail purposes, namely, providing home shopping services in the field of food by means of providing online specials on restaurant offerings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 30, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 14, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 13, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 12, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 16, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 8, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 29, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 10, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 15, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 16, 2023 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| May 16, 2023 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |