USPTO serial 97374717
OLE HENRIKSEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROCHA, CAMERON R
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OLE HENRIKSEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott J. Slavick
Scott J. Slavick BARACK FERRAZZANO KIRSCHBAUM & NAGELBERG LLP200 WEST MADISON STREET, SUITE 3900CHICAGO, IL 60606United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | downloadable mobile applications, namely, computer application software for mobile and smart phones for web browsing, retail services and shopping, e-commerce services, device and account management, audio and video streaming; digital media, namely, digital collectibles in the nature of downloadable multimedia files containing digital artwork in the field of skin care, cosmetics, nail care, and hair and scalp care authenticated by non-fungible tokens (NFTs); downloadable image files containing skin care, cosmetics, nail care, and hair and scalp care products authenticated by non-fungible tokens (NFTs) and other application tokens; downloadable image files containing skin care, cosmetics, nail care, and hair and scalp care products authenticated by non-fungible tokens (NFTs) via blockchain technology; digital collectible items in the nature of downloadable image files of skin care, cosmetics, nail care, and hair and scalp care products authenticated by non-fungible tokens (NFTs) used with blockchain technology; digital collectible images and videos in the field of skin care, cosmetics, nail care, and hair and scalp care authenticated by non-fungible tokens (NFTs); digital collectibles in the nature of downloadable image files featuring digital art in the field of skin care, cosmetics, nail care, and hair and scalp care authenticated by non-fungible tokens (NFTs); digital collectibles in the nature of downloadable multimedia files containing artwork in the field of skin care, cosmetics, nail care, and hair and scalp care authenticated by digital tokens used with blockchain technology; digital collectible items in the nature of downloadable multimedia files containing artwork in the field of skin care, cosmetics, nail care, and hair and scalp care authenticated by digital tokens used with blockchain technology; downloadable software for data storage and content access limitation authenticated by digital tokens used with blockchain technology; digital collectible items in the nature of downloadable multimedia files containing artwork in the field of skin care, cosmetics, nail care, and hair and scalp care authenticated by non-fungible tokens (NFTs) or other digital tokens based on blockchain technology | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2024 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 2, 2024 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 21, 2023 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2023 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2023 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2023 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 1, 2023 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 6, 2023 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2023 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 17, 2023 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2023 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 8, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 15, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |