USPTO serial 97379911
CYGUARD MAESTRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - AWAITING RESPONSE DOCKET
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CYGUARD MAESTRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Monica B. Mason, Esq.
Monica B. Mason, Esq. TRENAM LAW101 E. KENNEDY BLVD.SUITE 2700TAMPA, FL 33602Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Managed security services; cybersecurity services; providing managed security services, namely, security orchestration, security automation, and security incident response services and platforms, and threat intelligence services and platforms; providing Information Technology (IT) and Internet of Things (IOT) managed services, namely, remote management of the IT and IOT systems of others; Software-as-a-service (SAAS) services, namely, software that integrates all security technology into one definition to allow automation and orchestration of security data in one source; software-as-a-service (SAAS) services, namely, security orchestration, automation and response (SOAR) software solutions that combine incident response, orchestration and automation, and threat intelligence (TI) management capabilities in a single platform; software-as-a-service (SAAS) services, namely, SOAR software to document and implement playbooks, workflows and processes, support security incident management, and apply machine-based assistance to human security analysts and operators; software-as-a- service (SAAS) services, namely, SOAR software that integrates workflows with other technologies to achieve desired outcomes, namely, incident triage, incident response, TI curation and management, and compliance monitoring and management | ACTIVE | Nov 15, 2020 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 12, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 11, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 20, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 12, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 4, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 19, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 18, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |