USPTO serial 97380103
ROCKET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YAO, GRETTA
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ROCKET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NAREK ZOHRABYAN
NAREK ZOHRABYAN PHIL IP LAW INC.1055 EAST COLORADO BLVD., SUITE 5145PASADENA, CA 91106UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing a web site featuring technology that enables users to audit their website for compliance with accessibility legislation; Providing a website featuring non-downloadable software for evaluating web sites for compliance with accessibility legislation; Providing a website featuring technology that enables users to audit their website for compliance with accessibility legislation; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for valuating web sites for compliance with accessibility legislation; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for valuating web sites for compliance with accessibility legislation | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2023 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 18, 2023 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 18, 2023 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 18, 2023 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 13, 2023 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 22, 2023 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2023 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2023 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 12, 2023 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2023 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 25, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 13, 2023 | LOPR | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Feb 13, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2022 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| May 3, 2022 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |