Drawing for WITHINME

USPTO serial 97381020

WITHINME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AREY, BRANDON LEON
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WITHINME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Hyungsoo Ahn

4142 ADAMS AVE. UNIT 123SAN DIEGO, CA 92116United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Interactive online web journals for chronic illness and mental wellness, health tracking, and health questionnairesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 9, 2025PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
May 22, 2025PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
May 20, 2025APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Feb 11, 2025PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Feb 10, 2025TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Feb 10, 2025NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Feb 10, 2025PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 10, 2025PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2024MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 9, 2024ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 7, 2024NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 12, 2024NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 12, 2024PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 21, 2024NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2024NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2024CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 4, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 4, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 4, 2024ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 9, 2023NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Aug 8, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 8, 2023PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 8, 2023PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 8, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 8, 2023ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 22, 2023GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2023GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2023CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 14, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 2, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 29, 2022NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance