USPTO serial 97383589
FUSION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MMEJE, OBIEZE GINIKANWA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FUSION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SHERRY FLAX
SHERRY FLAX SAUL EWING ARNSTEIN & LEHR LLP500 E. PRATT ST.SUITE 900BALTIMORE, MD 21202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Coffee beans; Ground coffee beans | ACTIVE | Mar 24, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2025 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 1, 2025 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 1, 2025 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 20, 2025 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jan 8, 2025 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2025 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2025 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2023 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2023 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 20, 2023 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 15, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2023 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2023 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2023 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 21, 2023 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 19, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 18, 2023 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Apr 18, 2023 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 2022 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |