USPTO serial 97394444
QUAIL TECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BERNS, LEE ANNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with QUAIL TECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel Chalker
DANIEL CHALKER CHALKER FLORES, LLP14841 DALLAS PARKWAYSUITE 575DALLAS, TX 75254Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Promoting public awareness of the need for protection, enhancement, preservation, restoration, development, maintenance and management of wildlife habitat; promoting public awareness of the need for the study and research of wildlife habitats; promoting public awareness of the need for the acquisition, establishment and operation of protected areas for wildlife; promoting public awareness of the need for improvement of wildlife habitat, wildlife populations, and wildlife hunting; promoting public awareness of the need for programs and legislation relating to proper land development regarding wildlife; charitable services, namely, organizing and developing projects to promote awareness of wildlife conservation; promoting public interest and awareness of wildlife conservation and protection, environmental sustainability practices, and of the need for and benefits of education, science and research relating to ecosystems | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific research and consultation services in the field of wildlife conservation; scientific consulting services concerning conservation of habitat; scientific research relating to environmental protection; scientific research in the field of environmental conservation and preservation and preparing related expert reports and evaluations; providing scientific information and online scientific information about environmental conservation and preservation | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 20, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 20, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 3, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2022 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |