USPTO serial 97399932
REPELS BUGS, NOT PEOPLE.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SIMCOX, KYLE DUNCAN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with REPELS BUGS, NOT PEOPLE.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Newport Beach, CA
Newport Beach, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PAUL C. LLEWELLYN
PAUL C. LLEWELLYN ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER LLP250 WEST 55TH STREETNEW YORK, NY 10019-9710UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Sunscreen cream; Sunscreen creams; Sunscreen preparations; Sunscreen sticks; Cosmetic sunscreen preparations; Waterproof sunscreen | ABANDONED | — |
| 004 | Candles containing insect repellent; Lamp oils containing insect repellent | ABANDONED | — |
| 005 | Insect repellent agents; Insect repellent in the nature of a lamp oil; Insect repellent incense; Insect repellent preparations; Insect repellents; Insect repellents in pre-moistened towelette form; Insect repelling tags for pets; Insect-repellents; Mosquito repellents; Anti-insect spray; Medicated sunscreen; Pharmaceutical preparations for the relief of insect bites; Tissues impregnated with insect repellents; Topical dermatological preparations that treat insect bites and stings; Wearable insect repelling devices for attachment to clothing sold pre-filled with insect repelling preparations | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2024 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 19, 2024 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 19, 2024 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 19, 2024 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 7, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2023 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 13, 2023 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 15, 2023 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2023 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 26, 2023 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2023 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 6, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 7, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 24, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2022 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Sep 6, 2022 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |