USPTO serial 97409200
COTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BIBB, SCOTT
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RUI GEISSLER
RUI GEISSLER MUNCY, GEISSLER, OLDS & LOWE, P.C.SUITE 310, 4000 LEGATO ROADFAIRFAX, VA 22033UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely polo shirts; Footwear; Hats; Hosiery; Gloves as clothing; Neckties; Scarves; Veils; Belts for clothing; foundation garment Girdles | ABANDONED | — |
| 026 | Edgings for clothing; Lace for edgings; Embroidery; Shoe laces; Cords for clothing, namely, cords for trimming; Charms, other than for jewellery, key rings or key chains in the nature of ornamental novelty badges; Hat trimmings; Shoe trimmings; Decorative articles for the hair, namely, ribbons and bows being hair decorations; Trimmings for clothing | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Packaging design; Toy design; Dress designing; Design of costumes; Dress designing services; Fashion design consulting services; Jewelry design; Footwear design services; Graphic arts design; Commercial art design | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Beijing Kingway Animation Co., Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Beijing Kingway Animation Co., Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named COTE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2023 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 18, 2023 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 18, 2023 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 18, 2023 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 14, 2023 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 2, 2022 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 28, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 14, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 29, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |