USPTO serial 97409968
FASTPLAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RENNEKER, CHRISTOPHER JOHN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FASTPLAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael D. Hobbs, Jr., Esq.
Michael D. Hobbs, Jr., Esq. Troutman Pepper Locke LLP600 Peachtree Street, NE, Suite 3000Atlanta, GA 30308United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software and application software for registering users for online casino accounts and online casino game accounts; computer software and application software for managing access to online casinos and online casino games; computer software and application software for depositing and withdrawing funds for online casino accounts and online casino game accounts | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | software as a service (SaaS) featuring computer software and application software for registering users for online casino accounts and online casino game accounts; software as a service (SaaS) featuring computer software and application software for managing access to online casinos and online casino games; software as a service (SaaS) featuring computer software and application software for depositing and withdrawing funds for online casino accounts and online casino game accounts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 7, 2026 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 4, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 28, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2025 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Nov 28, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 28, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 4, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 4, 2025 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2025 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2025 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2025 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 1, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 26, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 28, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 29, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 29, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 29, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 30, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 29, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 23, 2023 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| May 23, 2023 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |