Drawing for COMFIER

USPTO serial 97417721

COMFIER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROWNING, LUKE CASH
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 117

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COMFIER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Norman R. Van Treeck

Norman R. Van Treeck Pasadena Legal GroupPO Box 3399Landers, CA 92285UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Faucets; Humidifiers; Air-conditioning installations; Beverage-cooling apparatus; Electric fans; Electric fans for personal use; Electric fans; Electrically heated clothing; Fans for air conditioning apparatus; Flush handles for toilets; Hydromassage bath apparatus; Ice boxes; Lighting apparatus, namely, lighting installations; Microbubble generators for baths; Portable electric fans; Radiators, electric; Refrigerating cabinets; Stoves being heating apparatus; Toilet seats; Toilet bowls; USB-powered hand warmers; Automatic faucets; Automatic flush valves for toilets; Electric pocket warmers for warming hands; Electric holiday lights; Facial saunas; Sauna bath installations; String lights for festive decoration; Ventilating exhaust fansACTIVEMay 1, 2022

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 21, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 21, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 15, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 5, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 4, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 3, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 29, 2024RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 23, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 5, 2024RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 2, 2023GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2023GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2023CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 1, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 1, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 1, 2023CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Sep 1, 2023ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 20, 2023NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Apr 19, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 19, 2023PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 19, 2023PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2023TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2023EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Apr 15, 2023ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 15, 2023REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 24, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 24, 2023ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 2, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 25, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 21, 2022NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance