USPTO serial 97423357
SITELINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, CLINTON J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SITELINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Redwood City, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steve Zemanick
Steve Zemanick FOUR REASONS LEGAL8074 E 34TH AVEDENVER, CO 80238UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for representing 3D computer models of buildings, building infrastructure and building systems and equipment for use in facilities management; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for qualifying, extracting, validating, and updating data from 3D computer models of buildings, namely, building locations, building systems, and building equipment for use in facilities management; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for managing building information, namely, documents, building locations, building systems and building assets, for use in facilities management; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for tracking building infrastructure meta data and building systems and equipment warranty periods; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for organizing and searching manuals, and warranties associated with the operation of buildings; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software that allows searching and viewing building information stored in document management systems for use in facilities management; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software that provides a data platform for integrating documents and data from document management systems, building maintenance management systems, and building performance and building analytics systems to provide integrated access and presentation of building information for use in facilities management; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software that allows searching and viewing building information from building maintenance management systems; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software that allows viewing of building information from a web portal for use in facilities management; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software that allows the assignment of tags to building information to improve search functionality; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software that allows the re-categorization of building information to improve search functionality; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software that allows facility owners of capital projects to manage construction warranty events; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software that allows operators to develop root cause analytics about construction warranty events | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 22, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 8, 2025 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2025 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 8, 2025 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 1, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 31, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 29, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 12, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 14, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 16, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 13, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 26, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |