USPTO serial 97424522
ABF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, KATHLEEN H
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ABF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
American Fork, UT, US
American Fork, UT, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Terrence J. Edwards
3290 W MAYFLOWER AVELEHI, UT 84043United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Technological project management and technological operational management, namely, providing consultations, evaluations, estimates, research, and reports for the design of products in the field of alternative energy generation; Engineering services; Engineering services in the field of lithium iron phosphate, lithium ion, and sodium fuel cells and electrical power production; Technological consulting services in the field of alternative energy generation; Consulting services in the field of design and development of lithium iron phosphate, lithium ion, and sodium fuel cell power stations, lithium iron phosphate, lithium ion, and sodium fuel cells, integrated lithium iron phosphate, lithium ion, and sodium fuel cell systems; Consultation in the field of product design and development of fuel cell powered products; Research and development and testing services of fuel cell powered products; Consultation in the field of product design and development of lithium iron phosphate power and lithium iron phosphate powered products; Research and development and testing services in the field of lithium iron phosphate power and lithium iron phosphate powered products; Designing industrial and commercial fuel cell systems; Designing industrial and commercial lithium iron phosphate, lithium ion, and sodium fuel cell systems; Fuel cell and lithium iron phosphate testing services; Designing, testing of fuel cell systems and generators; Designing, testing of lithium iron phosphate, lithium ion, and sodium fuel cell systems and generators; Designing in the nature of providing technological consultations, evaluations, estimates, research, and reports for the design of new products relating to alternative energy generation systems; Technological consulting, engineering, technological project development and technological project operation services in the field of fuel cells and lithium iron phosphate, lithium ion, and sodium fuel cell energy systems; Technological information, advisory and consultancy services in the field of alternative energy generation; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for diagnostics and operating fuel cell systems; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for lithium iron phosphate, lithium ion, and sodium fuel cell systems, namely, diagnostics and operating fuel cell systems; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for processing and validating fuel cell test parameter data; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for processing and validating lithium iron phosphate, lithium ion, and sodium fuel cell test parameter data | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2026 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 7, 2026 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 14, 2026 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2026 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2026 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 4, 2026 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2025 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2025 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2025 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 3, 2025 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 15, 2025 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2025 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 14, 2025 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 5, 2025 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 4, 2025 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2024 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2024 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 6, 2024 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2024 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 6, 2024 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 12, 2023 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2023 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 22, 2023 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2023 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 7, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2023 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2023 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2023 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 4, 2023 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 15, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 14, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 26, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |