Drawing for SECRETOPS

USPTO serial 97425898

SECRETOPS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TRUSILO, KELLY JEAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SECRETOPS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

A. Eric Bjorgum

A. Eric Bjorgum KARISH & BJORGUM, PC119 E. UNION STREET, SUITE BPASADENA, CA 91103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009(Based on Intent to Use) Downloadable or recorded computer software for authorizing access to databases; downloadable or recorded computer software for controlling and managing access to server applications; downloadable or recorded computer software for document management; downloadable or recorded computer software for secure administration of computer networksACTIVE—
042(Based on Use in Commerce) Computer software services, namely, designing computer software to secure and manage confidential software development information; providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software for authorizing access to databases; providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software for controlling and managing access to server applications; providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software for document management; providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software for secure administration of computer networksACTIVEApr 26, 2022

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 26, 2024MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 26, 2024ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 23, 2024NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 28, 2023NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 28, 2023PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 8, 2023NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 26, 2023CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 26, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 26, 2023ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 6, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 26, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 15, 2023GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2023GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2023CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 31, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 27, 2022NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance