USPTO serial 97428086
UNIFIED TECHNOLOGY PLATFORM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SENSOR, JAMES EARL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with UNIFIED TECHNOLOGY PLATFORM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Felicia J. Boyd
FELICIA J. BOYD NORTON ROSE FULBRIGHT US LLP98 SAN JACINTO BOULEVARD, SUITE 1100AUSTIN, TX 78701UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable electronic publications in the nature of articles, videos, in the field of learning, student services, education, curriculum management, and educational assessment; Downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for user authentication services using single sign-on technology for online software applications; Downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for single sign-on software; Downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for enabling individual authentication, single sign-on, for bi-directional data integration, secure data exchange, and streamlining data management | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Education services, namely, providing online resources in the nature of a website featuring blogs, articles, non-downloadable videos and non-downloadable articles in the fields of learning, student services, education, curriculum management, educational assessment, training, data analytics, educational employment, career counseling, college and vocational school selection, career options, education options, life options, and success after graduation; Education services, namely, providing online resources in the nature of a website featuring blogs, articles, non-downloadable videos and non-downloadable articles in the fields of software pertaining to learning, training, education, communications, management of student information technology, accounting, human resources, single sign on authentication, and data integration | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing user authentication services using single sign-on technology for online software applications; Providing use of on-line non-downloadable single sign-on software; Software as a service (SaaS) featuring a computer software platform enabling individual authentication, single sign-on, for bi-directional data integration, secure data exchange, and streamlining data management; Technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems; Computer software consulting; Computer technology consultancy in the field of data integration, secure data exchange, streamlining data management, and single sign on computer software platforms | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 26, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 26, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 11, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |