USPTO serial 97430519
GAME PLAYERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PARADEWELAI, BENJI YUEN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GAME PLAYERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Columbus, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Hester
David Hester RLAS2228 COLT DRIVESARATOGA SPRINGS, UT 84045UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Hats; Headwear; Hoodies; Pants; Shirts; Sweat jackets; Sweat pants; Sweat shirts; Sweat suits; Athletic jackets; Athletic shirts; T-shirts; Tee-shirts | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, providing podcasts in the field of video games, reviews, preview, videos, audio, podcasts, and articles about video games; Entertainment services, namely, providing a web site featuring photographic, audio, video and prose presentations featuring video games; Entertainment services, namely, providing on-line reviews of video games; Entertainment services, namely, providing video podcasts in the field of video games; On-line video journals, namely, vlogs featuring nondownloadable videos in the field of video games; On-line journals, namely, blogs featuring reviews, preview, videos, audio, podcasts, and articles about video games; Production and distribution of videos in the field of reviews, preview, videos, audio, podcasts, and articles about video games; Production of podcasts; Providing entertainment information in the fields of reviews, preview, videos, audio, podcasts, and articles about video games via a website; Providing non-downloadable videos in the field of video games via a website; Providing on-line publications in the nature of reviews, preview, videos, audio, podcasts, and articles in the field of video games; Providing a website featuring blogs and non-downloadable publications in the nature of reviews, preview, videos, audio, podcasts, and articles in the field(s) of video games; Providing entertainment information about video game tournaments and competitions via a website; Providing on-line tutorial videos in the field of video games, not downloadable; Providing online non-downloadable videos in the field of video games | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 10, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 25, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2023 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2023 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2023 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 11, 2023 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 11, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 11, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 15, 2023 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| May 15, 2023 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |