USPTO serial 97432302
ACCELERATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AVENT, TEAGUE A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 126
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ACCELERATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kitchener, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John W. McIlvaine, Registration No. 34,219
John W. McIlvaine, Registration No. 34,219 THE WEBB LAW FIRMONE GATEWAY CENTER420 FORT DUQUESNE BOULEVARD, SUITE 1200PITTSBURGH, PA 15222Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Agricultural biochemicals; anti-pathogen plant-protecting preparations; bacteria for the production of biochemicals; bacterial preparations for use in horticulture; biostimulants being chemicals for stimulating plant growth; biostimulants being plant growth stimulants; biostimulants being plant hormones; biostimulants being plant nutrition preparations; biostimulants for plants; biotechnologically-formed genes, microbes and enzymes for use in the production of agricultural seeds to enhance plants' growth therefrom; chemical preparations for preventing pathogenic infections in plants; chemical preparations for stabilizing soil; chemical soil conditioners; chemicals used in agriculture, horticulture and forestry; cultures of bacterial microorganisms for laboratory and scientific research; fertilisers for soil and potting soil; fertilizers; fertilizers for household plants; organic soil enhancement powders and preparations; plant fertilizers; plant food; plant growth fertilizers; plant growth regulating preparations; plant growth regulating substances; plant growth regulators; plant growth regulators for agricultural purposes; plant growth regulators for agricultural use; plant hormones; plant nutrient preparations; plant strengthening preparations; preparations for fortifying plants; preparations for protecting plants against pathogens; preparations for regulating plant growth; soil amendments for agricultural purposes; soil amendments for horticultural purposes; soil conditioners; soil conditioners for agricultural purposes; soil conditioners for horticultural purposes; soil fertilizers; soil improving agents; soil improving preparations; substances for regulating plant growth | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Agricultural biopesticides; agricultural pesticides; biopesticides for agricultural purposes; fungi for use as pest control for agricultural purposes; fungicides for horticultural purposes; pesticides for horticultural purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Mycelium for agricultural purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 25, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 11, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 20, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 19, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 26, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 28, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 29, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 29, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 29, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 1, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 5, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 8, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 15, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |