USPTO serial 97432614
PIXELS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MONINGHOFF, KIM TERESA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PIXELS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Grosse Ile, MI, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rajesh Fotedar
Rajesh Fotedar COGNITION IP P.C.50 California St., Suite 1500San Francisco, CA 94105United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for determining an amount of in-game currency based on progress of a user in a virtual world; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for determining an amount of cryptocurrency based on progress of a user in a virtual world; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for determining an amount of in-game currency based on progress of a user in a video game; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for determining an amount of cryptocurrency based on progress of a user in a video game; Providing temporary use of online for determining an amount of cryptocurrency that is interoperable for use across multiple virtual worlds; Providing temporary use of online for determining an amount of cryptocurrency that is interoperable for use across multiple video games; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for non-fungible tokens (NFTs) that correspond to varying amount of virtual property in a virtual world; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for NFTs that correspond to varying amount of virtual property in a video game; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for non-fungible tokens (NFTs) that correspond to allowing access to in-game mechanics of a video game; Software-as-a-Service (SAAS) featuring software for determining an amount of in-game currency based on progress of a user in a virtual world; SAAS featuring software for determining an amount of cryptocurrency based on progress of a user in a virtual world; SAAS featuring software for determining an amount of in-game currency based on progress of a user in a video game; SAAS featuring software for determining an amount of cryptocurrency based on progress of a user in a video game; SAAS featuring software for determining an amount of cryptocurrency that is interoperable for use across multiple virtual worlds; SAAS featuring software for determining an amount of cryptocurrency that is interoperable for use across multiple video games; SAAS featuring software for non-fungible tokens (NFTs) that correspond to varying amount of virtual property in a virtual world; SAAS featuring software for NFTs that correspond to varying amount of virtual property in a video game; SAAS featuring software for non-fungible tokens (NFTs) that correspond to allowing access to in-game mechanics of a video game | ACTIVE | Jan 31, 2022 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 30, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 30, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 27, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 29, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 31, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 2, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 2, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2023 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 27, 2023 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2023 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 6, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 6, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 18, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |