Drawing for DANDY TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 97435884

DANDY TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 616
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LIU, PHILIP HUAI-EN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DANDY TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jason R. Sytsma

Jason R. Sytsma SHUTTLEWORTH & INGERSOLL, PLC115 3RD STREET SESUITE 500CEDAR RAPIDS, IA 52401

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Robots with artificial intelligence for lawn mowing; Robotic fertilizer distributing, herbicide, and pesticide applying machines, other than hand-operated implements, featuring artificial intelligenceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 28, 2026NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
May 28, 2026PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 28, 2026PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2026MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 30, 2026ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 26, 2025NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 1, 2025NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 1, 2025PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 25, 2025NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 24, 2024ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 25, 2023PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Apr 12, 2023CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 11, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 10, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 10, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 22, 2023GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2023GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2023CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 7, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 3, 2022NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance