USPTO serial 97441475
HERBAN ORGANICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SEARS, DAVID
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 305- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HERBAN ORGANICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marek Krizka
477 MADISSON AVENUE, 6TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Chowder; Artificial sausage skins; Chicken nuggets; Chili con carne; Cooked meat dishes; Dried meat; Eggs; Fish, preserved; French fries; Fruit spreads; Guacamole; Hummus; Instant or pre-cooked soup; Jellies, jams, compotes; Meat; Meat extracts; Meat, frozen; Molluscs, not live; Nut-based snack foods; Omelettes; Potato chips; Powdered eggs; Prepared entrees consisting primarily of vegetables, soups, fruit salads and vegetable salads; Prepared meat; Processed eggs; Processed meat; Sausage casings; Seafood, not live; Soups; Stock; Tinned meat; Vegetable-based snack foods; Vegetable-based spreads; Prepared meals consisting primarily of vegetables; Prepared meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Bakery goods; Biscuit mixes; Biscuits; Bread; Bread mixes; Breakfast cereals; Brioches; Burritos; Buttercream fillings for cakes; Cake batter; Cakes; Candy; Candy bars; Cereal-based snack foods; Cereal based energy bars; Chewing gum; Chimichanga; Chocolate-based ready-to-eat food bars; Chocolate-coated nuts; Chocolate; Chocolate and chocolates; Chocolate mousse; Cocoa; Coffee and coffee substitutes; Confectionery made of sugar; Crackers; Crepes; Custard; Dough; Edible paper; Enchiladas; Fajitas; Flapjacks; Flour-based dumplings; Flour; Food flavorings being non-essential oils; Food leavening agents; Food seasonings; French toast; Frozen yogurt; Honey; Honey substitutes; Ice; Ice cream; Lasagna; Marzipan; Mirror glaze for baked goods; Nachos; Natural sweetener; Noodles; Pancakes; Pasta; Pastries; Pastry; Pies; Pizza; Popcorn; Porridge; Prepared pasta; Quesadillas; Ramen; Ready-to-eat cereals; Rice; Rice dumplings; Risotto; Salt; Salt crackers; Sandwiches; Sauces; Savoury and salted biscuits; Seasoning mixes; Seasonings; Sorbet; Spaghetti; Spices; Spring rolls; Sugar and sugar substitutes; Sushi; Sweets; Syrup for flavoring food or beverages; Tacos; Tarts; Tea; Tortillas; Treacle; Waffles; Wrap sandwiches; Yeast; Packaged meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 25, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 25, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 12, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |