Drawing for VIOLUX

USPTO serial 97448959

VIOLUX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ANDERSON,ELIZABETH C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIOLUX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ronald H. Spuhler

Ronald H. Spuhler McAndrews, Held & Malloy, Ltd.500 W Madison Street, 34th FloorChicago, IL 60661United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Phosphor-coated fiber optic temperature measurement probes for controlling processes involving RF, electromagnetic fields and interference, magnetic fields, and high voltages; Phosphor-coated fiber optic temperature measurement probes for controlling MRI systems; Phosphor-coated fiber optic temperature measurement probes for controlling processes involving power transformers; Phosphor-coated fiber optic temperature measurement probes for controlling semiconductor etch and deposition processes; Phosphor-coated fiber optic temperature measurement probes for controlling wafer temperature during high aspect ratio shaping and machining processes; and Phosphor-coated fiber optic temperature measurement probes for providing accurate, precise, and repeatable temperature measurements from -200 degrees Celsius to 450 degrees CelsiusACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 23, 2025MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 23, 2025ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 3, 2025EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 25, 2024EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 25, 2024EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 25, 2024EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 23, 2024EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 22, 2024EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 22, 2024EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 22, 2024EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 16, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 16, 2024ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 16, 2024REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 16, 2024CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jan 16, 2024COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Nov 22, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 20, 2023EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 20, 2023EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 20, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 23, 2023NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 8, 2023ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Dec 19, 2022ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 29, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 9, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 21, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 11, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 18, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 11, 2022NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance