USPTO serial 97449478
PHANTOM PAYS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALTREE, NICHOLAS
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PHANTOM PAYS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeanine M. Mitchell
Jeanine M. Mitchell ARISTOCRAT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.10220 ARISTOCRAT WAYLAS VEGAS, NV 89135UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | (Based on Intent to Use) Downloadable computer game software via a global computer network and wireless devices; Downloadable game software; Downloadable electronic games via the internet and wireless devices; Recorded game software(Based on 44(d) Priority Application) Downloadable computer game software via a global computer network and wireless devices; Downloadable game software; Downloadable electronic games via the internet and wireless devices; Recorded game software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 17, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 4, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 6, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 6, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 22, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 21, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |