USPTO serial 97450167
MICAP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LUCAS, PATRICK T
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MICAP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gregory M. Lefkowitz
Gregory M. Lefkowitz DUANE MORRIS LLPBR-IPD1875 NW CORPORATE BLVD, SUITE 300BOCA RATON, FL 33431Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | fertilizer production and processing machines for manufacturing fertilizer, and replacement parts therefor | ABANDONED | — |
| 009 | ionization apparatus for scientific or laboratory use; ionization apparatus and instruments featuring plasma sources for ionizing gas for scientific and laboratory applications; scientific apparatus and instruments, namely, spectrometers and parts and fittings therefor; hydrogen generation devices, namely, hydrogen generators for commercial and industrial use, and replacement parts therefor | ABANDONED | — |
| 011 | ionization apparatus for the treatment of liquids and gases for industrial use; apparatus and instruments featuring plasma sources for ionizing gas, being a treatment of gases, for industrial applications; waste processing machines using heat and chemical breakdown processes | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2023 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 28, 2023 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 24, 2023 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2023 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2023 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 19, 2023 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2023 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 23, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 24, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |