Drawing for PIXEL VAULT

USPTO serial 97450576

PIXEL VAULT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BARREDA, AMBER KYLEE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PIXEL VAULT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark A. Jansen

Mark A. Jansen FENWICK & WEST LLP801 CALIFORNIA STREETSILICON VALLEY CENTERMOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Toys, games and playthings, namely, board games, toy models, toy figures, articles of clothing for toys, toy tools, and game cards; modeled plastic toy figurines; attachable, wearable, magnetic toy figurines; plush toys; action figures; sports balls; basketballs; playing cards; trading cards for games; hand-held units for playing electronic games; hand-held units for playing video games; hand-held units for playing computer and interactive games in the nature of downloadable games, educational games, fantasy games, and action type target games; gaming devices, namely, gaming machines without or without video output; mobile gaming devices, namely, namely, gaming machines with or without video output for playing computer games and video games; amusement game machines; computer game consoles for recreational game playing; game controllers for computer and video games; computer game joysticks; video game joysticks; gaming mice; gaming keypads; skateboards; skateboard decksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 8, 2025MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 8, 2025ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 7, 2025EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 7, 2025EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 6, 2025EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 6, 2025EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 6, 2024EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 6, 2024EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 6, 2024EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 6, 2024EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 4, 2024EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 3, 2024EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 3, 2024EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 3, 2024EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 7, 2023NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 12, 2023NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 12, 2023PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 23, 2023NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 10, 2023FIXDELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE—
Aug 4, 2023ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
Aug 1, 2023CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 24, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 23, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 23, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 24, 2023GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2023GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2023CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 21, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 13, 2022NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance