USPTO serial 97452219
OSMO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 802
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AGREDA, SAMANTHA LEIGH
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OSMO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Elizabeth, NJ, US
Elizabeth, NJ, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JONATHAN M. GELCHINSKY
JONATHAN M. GELCHINSKY PIERCE ATWOOD LLP254 COMMERCIAL STREETPORTLAND, ME 04101United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software for the detection, digitization, analysis, and processing of odor, flavor, and other human sensory inputs; electronic sensors for the detection, digitization, analysis, and processing of odor, flavor, and other human sensory inputs, not for medical purposes; downloadable electronic data files featuring information regarding odor, flavor, and other human sensory inputs; digital system comprised of recorded software for the detection, digitization, analysis, and processing of odor, flavor, and other human sensory inputs, electronic sensors for the detection, digitization, analysis, and processing of odor, flavor, and other human sensory inputs, not for medical purposes, and associated downloadable electronic data files featuring information regarding the detection, digitization, analysis, and processing of odor, flavor, and other human sensory inputs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2026 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2026 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2026 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 16, 2026 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2026 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 27, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 14, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2026 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2026 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2026 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2026 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2026 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2026 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 21, 2026 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 27, 2025 | RGTR | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - TTAB REQUEST | — |
| Feb 26, 2025 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 26, 2025 | EXDM | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT | — |
| May 17, 2024 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 17, 2024 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 15, 2024 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Feb 15, 2024 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2023 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2023 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 21, 2023 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 12, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 10, 2023 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 2, 2023 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 5, 2023 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2023 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2023 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jun 23, 2023 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |