USPTO serial 97452795
BUMBLE BUGS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALTREE, NICHOLAS
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BUMBLE BUGS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeanine M. Mitchell
Jeanine M. Mitchell ARISTOCRAT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.10220 ARISTOCRAT WAYLAS VEGAS, NV 89135United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | (Based on Intent to Use) Downloadable computer game software via a global computer network and wireless devices; Downloadable game software; Downloadable electronic games via the internet and wireless devices; Recorded game software(Based on 44(d) Priority Application) Downloadable computer game software via a global computer network and wireless devices; Downloadable game software; Downloadable electronic games via the internet and wireless devices; Recorded game software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 3, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 19, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 17, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 17, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 25, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 25, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 14, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 23, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 23, 2023 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 23, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 23, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 23, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 21, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |