USPTO serial 97454751
FROM CONTENT TO CONTEXT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPILS, CAROL A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FROM CONTENT TO CONTEXT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Wilmington, DE
Wilmington, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Shay M. Markus
3 SHALEM STREETRAMAT GAN, 5221550ISRAELGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software as Service (SAAS) services featuring software for providing network security, system security, file security, email security, instant messaging security, SaaS security and data security; Application service provider, namely, hosting, managing, developing, and maintaining applications, software, and web sites, in the fields of computer security, data security and business information management based on artificial intelligence; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in threat prevention and monitoring of security threats to computers, computer systems, servers, computer networks, endpoints, mobile devices, and internet of things (IoT) enabled devices; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for the encryption and authentication of the integrity of data, digital assets, documents, and files across multiple channels; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for use in threat prevention and monitoring of security threats to computers, computer systems, servers, computer networks, endpoints, mobile devices, and internet of things (IoT) enabled devices; Infrastructure as a service (IAAS) services, namely, hosting servers for use by others; computer services, namely, providing databases as a service (DBaaS), namely, cloud hosting of computer databases for others; Computer services, namely, cloud hosting provider services; Computer security services, namely, enforcing, restricting and controlling access privileges of users of computing resources for cloud, mobile or network resources based on assigned credentials for computer security and data security for securing information across online computer functions, namely, email, instant messaging and file sharing and business information management; application service provider (ASP) featuring application programming interface (API) software for providing a platform for the development, testing, and integration of data security software applications; Technology consultation and research in the field of artificial intelligence; Computer security threat analysis for protecting data; Data security consultancy; Design and development of electronic data security systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 2024 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 18, 2024 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 15, 2023 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 20, 2023 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2023 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 31, 2023 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2023 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 15, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 19, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |