USPTO serial 97456669
CITISKETCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MURRAY, GEORGE WILLIAM
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CITISKETCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Fredericton, NB, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James L. Scott
James L. Scott Privus PLC7125 Headley Street SEUnit 1084Ada, MI 49301Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software as a service (SaaS) featuring computer software for creating predictive visual representations of a community using land use, transportation, quality of life, sustainability, and economics data, which allows users to explore, plan and visualize a community | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 6, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 23, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 24, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 9, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 1, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 4, 2024 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 3, 2024 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2024 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2024 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 3, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 27, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |