USPTO serial 97461501
MIRRA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AIKENS, RONALD E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MIRRA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kathryn Starshak
Kathryn Starshak K&L GATES LLPP.O. BOX 1135CHICAGO, IL 60690-1135United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software for synchronizing tenant's access control system with the base building system; downloadable software for simplifying credential management; downloadable computer software for use in building security systems; electronic access control systems; card based access credentials, namely electronic identification cards and tags | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Non-downloadable software for synchronizing tenant's access control system with the base building system; non-downloadable software for simplifying credential management; non- downloadable software for use in building security systems; installation and maintenance of software for building security and access control systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 7, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 23, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 22, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 25, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 24, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 28, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 22, 2025 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 22, 2025 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 18, 2025 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 27, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 26, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 25, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 6, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 26, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 23, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 18, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |