USPTO serial 97467362
SORA PARTNERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCHAEFER, REBECCA ANN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SORA PARTNERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas C. McThenia, Jr.
Thomas C. McThenia, Jr. GRAYROBINSON, PA301 EAST PINE STREET, SUITE 1400ORLANDO, FL 32801UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Consulting services, namely, consulting services relating to point-of-sale systems, software, and IT technology for restaurants and the hospitality industry; technology consulting services for point-of-sale systems, software and IT Technology for restaurants and the hospitality industry; software and computer-based information system consulting in the areas of internet website design, web application development, menu build and software application development for restaurants and the hospitality industry; software and computer-based information system consulting in the areas of managed internet, website and application hosting services for point-of-sale systems, software, hardware, equipment, networks and IT systems for restaurants and the hospitality industry; software as a service (SAAS) service, namely, hosting software for use by others for support and maintenance of point of sale systems, software, hardware, equipment, networks and IT systems for restaurants and the hospitality industry; implementation services for point of sale systems, software, hardware, equipment, networks and IT systems for restaurants and the hospitality industry; computer services, namely, remote and onsite management of point of sale systems for restaurants and the hospitality industry; website design and development for the restaurant and hospitality industries; computer technology support services, namely, information technology management and helpdesk services for point of sale systems for restaurants and the hospitality industry; consulting services for technology design and implementation, menu design and layout, and operations for restaurants and the hospitality industry; computer services, namely, managing and hosting internet services and Wi-Fi systems for restaurants and the hospitality industry; computer services, namely, managing and hosting software and technology systems for PCI security and security of point of sale systems and IT technology and software for restaurants and the hospitality industry | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 12, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 12, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 25, 2023 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jul 25, 2023 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |