USPTO serial 97468431
REALA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KRASS, KRISTINA M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 303- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with REALA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Suzanne M. Hengl
SUZANNE M. HENGL BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.44TH FLOOR30 ROCKEFELLER PLAZANEW YORK, NY 10112-4498Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for controlling color reproduction and gradation expression; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for capturing, processing, editing, filtering or enhancing digital images, videos, and photographs; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for post processing of photographic images; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for editing, adjusting, storing and printing digital images, including developing for RAW image data; platform as a service (PAAS) for processing or filtering digital images, videos, and photographs; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for controlling color reproduction and gradation expression; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for capturing, processing, editing, filtering or enhancing digital images, videos, and photographs; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for post processing of photographic images; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for editing, adjusting, storing and printing digital images, including developing for RAW image data; software as a service (SAAS) for processing or filtering digital images, videos, and photographs; hosting of digital content on the Internet; cloud computing, namely, providing virtual computer systems and virtual computer environments through cloud computing; providing on-line non-downloadable augmented reality software for processing or filtering digital images, videos, and photographs; providing on-line non-downloadable computer programs and software for image processing; providing on-line non-downloadable computer programs and software for editing and compositing captured digital images; providing on-line non-downloadable computer programs and software for controlling color reproduction and gradation expression; providing on-line non-downloadable computer programs and software for capturing, processing, editing, filtering or enhancing digital images, videos, and photographs; providing on-line non-downloadable computer programs and software for post processing of photographic images; providing on-line non-downloadable computer programs and software for editing, adjusting, storing and printing digital images, including developing for RAW image data; providing online, non-downloadable computer programs for processing or filtering digital images, videos, and photographs; providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer programs for processing or filtering digital images, videos, and photographs; providing online, non-downloadable software for processing or filtering digital images, videos, and photographs; providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for processing or filtering digital images, videos, and photographs; electronic storage of text data, image data, audio data, video data and electronic data; electronic data storage; management of electronic data; rental of server memory space via computer communication networks; server hosting; electronic storage of audio, data, images, videos, photographs and documents; computer software design, computer programming, or maintenance of computer software; computer technology consultancy | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 24, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 24, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 5, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |