USPTO serial 97468936
PROVISIONING IN MINUTES NOT MONTHS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALLEN, BIANCA LEIGH
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PROVISIONING IN MINUTES NOT MONTHS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael Markos
Michael Markos LEGALFORCE RAPC WORLDWIDE, P.C.446 E SOUTHERN AVETEMPE, AZ 85282United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software as a Service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in database management by the global marketplace in the field of business process management; Software as a Service (SAAS) services featuring software for business process management; Software as a Service (SAAS) services featuring software for business process management and connecting financial service providers with users in the field of business process management; Communication Platform as a Service (CPAAS) services featuring cloud-based software for customer onboarding, service procurement, and training in communication automation; Communication Platform as a Service (CPAAS) services featuring cloudbased software for use in database management by the global marketplace in the field of business process management; Communication Platform as a Service Services (CPAAS) featuring cloud-based software for billing, monitoring, and analytics on demand for businesses; Communication Platform as a Service Services (CPAAS) featuring cloud-based software for machine learning and business process management; Communication Platform as a Service Services (CPAAS) featuring cloud-based software for procuring, configuring, routing, and activating voice and data products for businesses; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for business process management; Telecommunications technology consultancy; Communication Platform as a Service (CPAAS) services featuring cloud-based software for procuring, configuring, routing, activating, and managing voice network, video conferencing, and collaboration infrastructure for businesses; Unified communications as a services (UCAAS) services featuring software for use in telecommunications technology, namely, for provisioning of UcaaS across multiple feature service platforms; Design of unified communications services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Nuwave Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Nuwave Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PROVISIONING IN MINUTES NOT MONTHS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2024 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 12, 2024 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 7, 2023 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2023 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2023 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2023 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 13, 2023 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2023 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2023 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 25, 2023 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2023 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 25, 2023 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2023 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 25, 2023 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2023 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 14, 2023 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 10, 2023 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2023 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Apr 11, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 11, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2023 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 15, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 26, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 6, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 28, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |