USPTO serial 97490897
KAPPA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JONES, JACQUELYN ANDREA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KAPPA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joshua M. Gerben, Esq.
Joshua M. Gerben, Esq. GERBEN PERROTT, PLLC1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NW, SUITE 500WASHINGTON, DC 20036United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software for transferring money; Downloadable software for receiving money; Downloadable software for managing bank accounts; Downloadable software for tracking transfers of money; Downloadable software for accessing bank account information; Downloadable software for conducting bank transactions; Downloadable software for submitting payment of bills; Downloadable software for submitting payment of invoices; Downloadable software for managing receipts and invoices | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Bill payment services; Electronic foreign exchange payment processing; Electronic transfer of money; Electronic transfer of virtual currencies; Financial transaction services, namely, providing secure commercial transactions and payment options using a mobile device at a point of sale | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing a website featuring technology that enables users to transfer money; Providing a website featuring technology that enables users to receive money; Providing a website featuring technology that enables users to manage bank accounts; Providing a website featuring technology that enables users to track transfers of money; Providing a website featuring technology that enables users to access bank account information; Providing a website featuring technology that enables users to conduct bank transactions; Providing a website featuring technology that enables users to submit payment of bills; Providing a website featuring technology that enables users to submit payment of invoices; Providing a website featuring technology that enables users to manage receipts and invoices; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for transferring money; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for receiving money; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for managing bank accounts; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for tracking transfers of money; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for accessing bank account information; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for conducting bank transactions; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for submitting payment of bills; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for submitting payment of invoices; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for managing receipts and invoices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 27, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 5, 2025 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2025 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 5, 2025 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 10, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 7, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 10, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 7, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 20, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |