USPTO serial 97495313
C2F
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FITZSIMONS, MICHAEL R
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with C2F?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Katja Loeffelholz
Katja Loeffelholz DICKENSON, PEATMAN & FOGARTY1500 FIRST STREET, STE 200NAPA, CA 94559United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Herbal supplements for general health and well-being; herbal supplements for the treatment of headaches; herbal supplements for the treatment of the musculoskeletal system, namely, connective tissue diseases, cartilage injuries; herbicide for agricultural use; herbicides; herbicides for agricultural purposes; herbicides for domestic use; homeopathic remedies being supplements for the treatment of headaches | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | agricultural seeds, bulbs for agricultural purposes; cut flowers, flowering plants, fresh berries, fresh tomatoes, fresh vegetables, unprocessed grains | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | scientific research in the field of plant genetics; scientific research in the field of plant propagation; scientific research in the field of genetic engineering | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Advisory and consultancy services relating to agricultural and horticultural processes; consultancy relating to horticulture; consultancy services relating to horticulture; cultivation of plants for others; horticultural services; horticulture services; providing information in the field of agriculture and horticulture; providing information in the field of sustainable agriculture; providing information in the field of sustainable agriculture via a website | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Agriforce Growing Systems Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named C2F
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 15, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 24, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 9, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 8, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 7, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 24, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 17, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 15, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 15, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 7, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 26, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 25, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 22, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2022 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 27, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2022 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |