USPTO serial 97499681
INTUITIONNX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COLEMAN, CIMMERIAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INTUITIONNX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher A. Proskey
Christopher A. Proskey BROWNWINICK LAW FIRM666 GRAND AVENUE, SUITE 2000DES MOINES, IA 50309United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in diagnostic radiology; Application service provider (ASP) featuring software for use in diagnostic radiology; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in medical imaging; Application service provider (ASP) featuring software for use in medical imaging; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in viewing electronic medical records (EMR) and medical images, video, and data; Application service provider (ASP) featuring software for use in viewing electronic medical records (EMR) and medical images, video, and data; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in medical workflow management; Application service provider (ASP) featuring software for use in medical workflow management; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for reporting the results of radiology examinations; Application service provider (ASP) featuring software for reporting the results of radiology examinations; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in creating and maintaining medical image archives and clinical content; Application service provider (ASP) featuring software for use in creating and maintaining medical image archives and clinical content; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for image management, viewing and processing for use in the fields of medical imaging, disease screening and medical treatment planning; Application service provider (ASP) featuring software for image management, viewing and processing for use in the fields of medical imaging, disease screening and medical treatment planning; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in collecting, transmission, capturing, processing, reading, interpreting, analyzing, manipulating, viewing and sharing of medical images, video, and data; Application service provider (ASP) featuring software for use in collecting, transmission, capturing, processing, reading, interpreting, analyzing, manipulating, viewing and sharing of medical images, video, and data; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for processing and analyzing digital images of the anatomy for diagnosis and treatment; Application service provider (ASP) featuring software for processing and analyzing digital images of the anatomy for diagnosis and treatment; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms to analyze medical images; Application service provider (ASP) featuring software using artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms to analyze medical images | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2025 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 26, 2025 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 14, 2024 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2024 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2024 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2024 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 23, 2024 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2024 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 22, 2024 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2024 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 24, 2023 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 29, 2023 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2023 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 9, 2023 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2023 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 25, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 4, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |