Drawing for PROTAPER

USPTO serial 97505001

PROTAPER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KEATING, MICHAEL P
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROTAPER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kenneth D. Suzan

Kenneth D. Suzan BARNES & THORNBURG LLP225 SOUTH SIXTH STREET, SUITE 2800MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Protective eyewear, articles of protective clothing for wear by riders of electric bicycles for protection against accident or injury; protective equipment for operating an electric bicycle, namely, bicycle helmets and gloves for protection against accidentsACTIVE
012Electric bicycles; handlebars, handlebar grips, gear shift and rear brake levers, and other controls for e-bikes in the nature of brake and clutch levers, and steering stems for electric bicyclesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 2, 2024MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 2, 2024ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 30, 2024NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 20, 2023ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Dec 5, 2023NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Dec 5, 2023PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 15, 2023NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Nov 8, 2023ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Nov 2, 2023CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 1, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 31, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 31, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 1, 2023XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED
Aug 1, 2023XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED
May 4, 2023GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2023GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2023CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 1, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 4, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jul 19, 2022NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance