USPTO serial 97512273
S SCENTYS EXCELLENCE IN FRAGRANCE DIFFUSION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRYANT, ALEXANDRIA N
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with S SCENTYS EXCELLENCE IN FRAGRANCE DIFFUSION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Molly Hunsinger
Molly Hunsinger LADAS & PARRY LLP224 S. MICHIGAN AVE., STE. 1600CHICAGO, IL 60604United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Perfumery products, namely, perfumery, air perfumes; essential oils; incense; scented air fresheners in spray form, namely, air fragrancing preparations; refills for electric home fragrance diffusers in particular refills for electric diffusers for air fragrancing preparations; products for perfuming the air, namely, room fragrances, scented room sprays, scented room incense; capsules filled with perfumes, namely, perfumery, air perfumes; refills for fragrance diffuser devices being refills for electric diffusers for air fragrancing preparations, refills for non-electric diffusers for air fragrancing preparations; refillable perfume capsules for fragrance diffusers being refills for electric diffusers for air fragrancing preparations, refills for nonelectric diffusers for air fragrancing preparations | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Downloadable software for controlling electric fragrance diffusers; Downloadable software for operating diffusers, integrating diffusers into a smart-home network for the diffusion of odors | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Ventilation devices, namely, apparatuses and machines in the nature of dispensing units for perfuming air being electric diffusers for air fragrancing; apparatus and machines for perfuming the air and purifying the air being electric diffusers for air fragrancing preparations; electric air freshener diffusers being electric diffusers for air fragrancing; electric fragrance diffuser devices being electric diffusers for air fragrancing preparations; electric fragrance diffusers being electric diffusers for air fragrancing preparations; perfume dispensing units being electric diffusers for air fragrancing preparations; fragrance diffusers being electric diffusers for air fragrancing preparations being gels and aerosols with gels, aerosols and pumps sold as a unit; parts and constituent parts of electric perfume diffusers being electric diffusers for air fragrancing preparations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SCENTYS
- Other trademarks owned by SCENTYS
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named S SCENTYS EXCELLENCE IN FRAGRANCE DIFFUSION
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2025 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 14, 2025 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2024 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2024 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2024 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2024 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 2, 2024 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 6, 2024 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2024 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 17, 2024 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2024 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 22, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 27, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 10, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2022 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |